![]() ![]() Mr Trump and his allies have long accused the FBI of leading a partisan “hoax” or “witch hunt” to discredit him, but federal law enforcement and lengthy investigations have confirmed not only “sweeping and systematic” Russian interference into US elections through social media but also have led to several indictments involving former Trump aides and Russian nationals and companies. The indictment also notes that Mr Danchenko’s claims “played a role in the FBI’s investigative decisions and in sworn representations that the FBI made to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.” The charges allege that Mr Danchenko “made false statements regarding the sources of certain information that he provided to a UK investigative firm that was then included in reports prepared by the UK investigative firm and subsequently passed to the FBI,” according to a statement from the Justice Department.įederal law enforcement alleges that he passed along information he knew was untrue, including an allegation of a “conspiracy of cooperation” and that “there were communications ongoing between the Trump campaign and Russian officials and that had indicated the Kremlin might be of help in getting Trump elected.” But prosecutors want to present evidence to the jury about it nonetheless, and elicit testimony that would suggest Dolan was Danchenko’s source for that allegation as well.He was set to appear in US District Court in Virginia on Thursday afternoon. Danchenko is not actually charged with lying to the FBI about his sourcing for that specific allegation. The most incendiary allegations in the Steele dossier - that Trump hired prostitutes to engage in sexual activity in the presidential suite of the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow - may not be part of the trial at all. Trenga said he will revisit the issue during trial after the government presents its case. It will be up to a jury to determine whether the government can meet its burden of proving a crime beyond a reasonable doubt, a much higher standard. The judge, Anthony Trenga, acknowledged that the defense’s theory “can be a very persuasive, strong argument to a jury,” but he said that ultimately the government met its burden to overcome a motion to dismiss. “He knows exactly what the FBI is looking for, the context of those questions,” Durham said. The indictment alleges Danchenko lied about the credibility of his sources when in reality his primary source was actually a Democratic operative named Charles Dolan with ties to Trump’s opponent in the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton. The dossier famously suggested that Russians had compromising information on Trump regarding salacious sexual activity he allegedly engaged in at a Moscow hotel. He’s accused of lying to the FBI about how he obtained the information that ultimately made its way into the “Steele dossier,” a report that purported to detail connections between Trump and Russian intelligence and helped fuel a full-fledged FBI investigation called “Crossfire Hurricane” in the months leading up to the 2016 election. ![]() ![]() District Court in Alexandria to dismiss all five charges against him. Lawyers for Igor Danchenko asked a judge Thursday in U.S. (AP) - A judge is allowing prosecutors to move forward with their criminal case against an analyst who provided key details for a flawed dossier on ex-President Donald Trump, although the judge called his decision “an extremely close call.” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |